Most people are aware that Dickens, like many other writers
of his age, wrote most of his literature for serial publication in monthly
installments; this accounts for many of the peculiar features of Dickensian
style, in fact. Even when complete, however, many of Dickens’s novels reached
their original reading public in a cheap format more akin to modern paperback
romances than great works of Literature. Also, as I've mentioned in the past, many of Dickens's works appeared in America under questionable circumstances -- circumstances that also speak to the high demand for cheap editions of Dickens for popular readers.
This week’s book is a great example of both these phenomena: it’s a flimsy
pamphlet edition of No Thoroughfare,
by Dickens and English novelist and dramatist Wilkie Collins, published by T. B.
Peterson & Brothers of 306
Chestnut Street in Philadelphia. No
Thoroughfare began its life as a play
by Dickens and Collins, premiering at the Adelphi Theatre in London in December
1867, followed by performances (often using versions of the script rather than
the original) elsewhere in England, in Boston, Philadelphia, and Paris; pirated
versions of the script were also used to stage unlicensed plays in Boston and
New York. It was last professionally staged in Islington in 1903; it is the
only Dickens-related dramatic work to have had no subsequent life on stage or
screen. No Thoroughfare was the last
play in which Dickens – a famously dedicated theater aficionado and amateur –
was involved (he died in 1870) and also the most lucrative and successful. At
around the same time that it appeared on stage, a novelized version of No Thoroughfare was published in the
Christmas issue of the periodical All The
Year Round and simultaneously in Boston’s Every Saturday magazine, published by Ticknor and Fields. Scholars
believe that Collins was mainly responsible for the stage version and that Dickens
was in charge of the novelization. In an attempt to cross-market the published
version and the stage version, the novel is divided into five “acts” rather
than into chapters and section headings often use theatrical jargon (“enter…”,
“exit…”, etc.).![]() |
| The original London cast of No Thoroughfare (1867) |
As a case study in using cautious skepticism when reading
what dealers jot down on their copies, I’d point out that whomever the dealer
was who was trying to sell this (I ended up getting it at auction), they
penciled “1850?” in the upper outside corner of the front cover. The question
mark is, of course, a bit of an understatement since the book itself wouldn't be written for
another seventeen years after that date.
| Stab-stitches indicate that an item is a pamphlet rather than a book |
The pamphlet is stab-stitched with white thread; the outer
paper wraps are a semi-glossy salmon color (called “buff” paper) with black ink
for the advertising, title, and an illustration from a scene in the book.
Inside the front cover is a detailed ad listing the prices for all the
different kinds of Dickens editions Peterson & Brothers offers; inside the
back cover is an ad for the company’s Cheap Edition of the Waverly Novels. The
verso of the back advertises the complete Dickens. Inside, the book is printed
on cheap newsprint stock with the text in two columns per page. Following the
title-page, with the table of contents on the verso, the entire novel itself is
46 pages; thus, including the title-page/contents, it runs 24 leaves in octavo
(the second and third gatherings are signed numerically in the lower margin
beneath the left column of the recto page; the first gathering is not signed).
There is no marginalia, but the copy is ragged on the edges (no text is lost,
however), so it has clearly been read over the years. There is some foxing
throughout and at some point tape was used to make some rudimentary repairs to
the binding.
One thing that strikes me as odd is the pagination. After
the title-page, the novel begins on p. 21 and ends on p. 66. Also, the
title-page itself is not integral to the first gathering; rather, the final
leaf of the gathering lacks a conjugate. What is going on here? Understanding
how Peterson & Brothers made this pamphlet is important because it
illuminates both an historical moment that gave rise to modern notions of
overseas copyright and more broadly the idea of how literary texts were
circulated through a physical “regurgitation” that ensured publishers of quick
profits and readers of cheap, readily available books.
Dickens’s ferocious popularity in America during his
lifetime gave rise to intense competition between publishers for his
manuscripts, proof sheets, or anything else they could use to make and sell
works by Dickens. Advances in the mechanization of printing that made it more
efficient to print in volume and the development of new technologies for making
truly cheap paper also both added fuel to this fire. This mania for cheap, mass
produced Dickens reached its first crest in 1842, during a visit he paid to
America; he left bitter and irate that so many publishers and booksellers were
profiting off his creative work while he was seeing only marginal returns from
the upsurge in the market. In 1867-8 he returned to America for a book tour
(during this tour he corresponded by post with Wilkie about their joint
project) and the furor took a more
positive turn; a group of American publishers even organized in support of
a new US-Great Britain mutual copyright bill. In April 1867, Dickens issued a
statement that Ticknor and Fields was “the only authorized representatives in
America of the whole series of my books.” This created problems for many American
publishers, especially Ticknor’s prime competitor, Harper Brothers, but also Peterson,
who had collaborated with Harper on many American editions of Dickens since
before the 1850s. Peterson’s practice had been to buy advance sheets for serial
runs from Harper’s Weekly and Harper’s Monthly, in effect obtaining (indirectly)
priority over later publishers who took the trouble to obtain rights from
London and Dickens directly. (For a summary of this affair, see, among others,
Robert McParland, Charles Dickens’s
American Audience [Lexington Books, 2010], esp. 59-62.)
The image projected by this pamphlet is starkly at odds with
the authoritative, heavy-tome image of Dickens. Instead of being a repository
of Great Literature, this Dickens novel advertises itself and its contents as
trivial and, literally, “cheap”, designed not for the elite, erudite scholar
but for the “99%” of general readers, “the million”: the paper is the flimsiest
available not unlike a "pulp" fiction novel of the mid-twentieth century, the text is compressed as if it were a magazine article, the content
is quite possibly actually contraband, and the advertising all over the paper
covers trumpets its easy availability for any and all. It was designed to be
bought by the casual, working-class reader, used quickly, and then discarded;
it was not designed to last – which is quite different from the image of
Dickens’s writing as among the Great Classics of the English Canon meant to
survive through all time.

No comments:
Post a Comment